/50

Landmark Case Laws

Practice Test 3

1 / 50

The judgment in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India AIR 1993 SC 477 (Mandal Commission case) clarified that reservations in public employment could not exceed:

2 / 50

The Nuremberg Trials, which prosecuted individuals for war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity, were held after which major international conflict?

3 / 50

In Sodan Singh v. New Delhi Municipality, AIR 1989 SC 1988 the Supreme Court considered the responsibilities of:

4 / 50

In the case of Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), the ICJ ruled on issues related to:

5 / 50

In the case of Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta AIR 2018 SC 487, the Supreme Court clarified that the creamy layer concept is not applicable to:

6 / 50

M.H. Quareshi v. State of Bihar, AIR 1958 SC 731 had implications for the constitutional interpretation of:

7 / 50

The judgment in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597 expanded the scope of personal liberty under Article 21 to include the right to:

8 / 50

The Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, dealt with issues related to:

9 / 50

Which case involved the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) determining that private individuals could bring claims against states before an international court?

10 / 50

In which case did the Supreme Court assert that “the right to speedy trial is implicit in the right to life and personal liberty”?

11 / 50

In Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar AIR 1979 SC 1360, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of:

12 / 50

In the case of Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States), the International Court of Justice addressed issues related to:

13 / 50

In which case did the Supreme Court affirm that the right to legal representation is an essential ingredient of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, and is also protected under Article 22(1)?

14 / 50

The judgment in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India AIR 1994 SC 1918 addressed the issue of state interference in religious matters and emphasized the need for maintaining:

15 / 50

The judgment in Devadasan v. Union of India AIR 1964 SC 179 established that reservation in promotions must be made only if the conditions specified in:

16 / 50

In the Bombay Hawkers Union case, the Supreme Court considered the balance between:

17 / 50

In the National Flag case, the Supreme Court addressed issues related to:

18 / 50

Which case clarified that the protection under Article 22(1) is not limited to citizens and applies to any person, including aliens?

19 / 50

Which case clarified that Article 22(5) does not permit preventive detention beyond the maximum period prescribed by law?

20 / 50

Which case emphasized that Article 24 prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 in hazardous occupations?

21 / 50

Which case emphasized that “the right against solitary confinement is inherent in the right to life”?

22 / 50

The judgment in M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1997 SC 699 specified that the prohibition under Article 24 extends to both:

23 / 50

In the case of Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), the ICJ addressed the issue of:

24 / 50

Union of India v. Naveen Jindal & Another, AIR 2004 SC 1559 involved the misuse of the:

25 / 50

The case of People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India AIR 1982 SC 1473 discussed the constitutional validity of laws relating to:

26 / 50

In the case of Ahmedabad St. Xavier’s College Society v. State of Gujarat AIR 1974 SC 1389, the Supreme Court ruled that the state’s power to regulate educational institutions extends to the regulation of:

27 / 50

Which case ruled that “the right to die with dignity is a fundamental right”?

28 / 50

In the judgment of Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India AIR 2008 SC 1168, the Supreme Court dealt with the issue of reservations in:

29 / 50

The Bombay Hawkers Union case is significant for addressing the rights of:

30 / 50

In the case of State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan AIR 1951 SC 226, the Supreme Court held that:

31 / 50

The case of Farid Ahmed v. District Board, Allahabad AIR 1967 SC 799 highlighted that Article 15 prohibits discrimination not only by the State but also by:

32 / 50

Shyam Narayan Chouksey case is associated with issues related to:

33 / 50

The case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27 focused on the interpretation of:

34 / 50

The judgment in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration AIR 1978 SC 1675 discussed the right of a detained person to:

35 / 50

Shreya Singhal case dealt with the constitutional validity of:

36 / 50

The case of Menaka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597 held that the procedure established by law under Article 21 must be:

37 / 50

The case of Trail Smelter Arbitration (United States v. Canada) is significant for establishing principles related to:

38 / 50

In Bennett Coleman case, the Supreme Court interpreted the scope of:

39 / 50

The Mirzapur Moti Kureshi case addressed issues related to:

40 / 50

The judgment in Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India AIR 2008 SC 663 emphasized that discrimination on the grounds of sex in service conditions is prohibited under Article 15(1) and is not subject to the:

41 / 50

The case of Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 SC 1295 dealt with the constitutional validity of:

42 / 50

In the context of Article 24, the case of Vishal Jeet v. Union of India AIR 1990 SC 1412 dealt with the employment of children in:

43 / 50

In Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka AIR 1992 SC 1858, the Supreme Court dealt with the issue of collecting capitation fee in educational institutions and upheld the importance of:

44 / 50

The Lotus Case (France v. Turkey) is known for establishing the principle that:

45 / 50

In which case did the Supreme Court rule that “the handcuffing of prisoners violates their dignity and is unconstitutional”?

46 / 50

The South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China) addressed disputes over:

47 / 50

The judgment in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 2005 SC 1924 dealt with reservations in:

48 / 50

In the case of M. Nagaraj v. Union of India AIR 2006 SC 1676, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of:

49 / 50

The case of Balaji v. State of Mysore AIR 1963 SC 649 clarified that reservations based on caste can be made in:

50 / 50

In the context of Article 22, the case of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal AIR 1997 SC 610 addressed the issue of:

For more Quiz updates !
Give you Name & Contact info.

Your score is

0%

Average score : 19%

Leaderboard

Pos.NameDurationPoints
There is no data yet

Best score

You must log in to see your results.

Progress

You must log in to see your results.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top