The case of Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India (1970) 1 SCC 248 affirmed that the conferment of awards and titles by the State should not be:

In which case did the Supreme Court assert that “the right to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business is subject to reasonable restrictions”?

Which case established the “neighbour principle,” recognizing a duty of care owed to foreseeable persons in negligence claims?

In which case did the Supreme Court establish the doctrine of “proximate and direct nexus” regarding restrictions on freedom of speech?

The legal issues addressed in Re Berubari Union case have implications for:

Which case established the doctrine of constructive res judicata and held that a decision on a question of law operates as res judicata in a subsequent suit?

The case of Prem Nath Kaul v. State of Jammu & Kashmir (1959) SCR 830 challenged the appointment of the President of India as the:

In N. Masthan Sahib case, the Supreme Court considered the intersection of:

The case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597 expanded the scope of personal liberty under Article 19(1)(a) to include:

In Chairman, Rly Board v Chandrima Das, the Supreme Court decision impacted the interpretation of:

The case of State of Madras v. V.G. Row AIR 1952 SC 196 discussed the validity of restrictions on the:

In which case did the Supreme Court declare that the acceptance of honorary titles by individuals is a matter of personal choice and does not violate the principles of Article 18?

In which case did the Supreme Court affirm that “the right to life includes the right to live with human dignity”?

The case of Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562 is famous for establishing the legal principle of:

Which case emphasized that “the right to form associations or unions is not an absolute right and can be restricted for public order”?

Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel case challenged the constitutionality of reservation policies based on:

In the case of Ashby v. White (1703) 92 ER 126, the court addressed the issue of:

Pradeep Jain (Dr.) v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 1420: played a significant role in interpreting which article of the Indian Constitution?

In which case did the Supreme Court of India recognize the concept of “strict liability” in tort law for activities involving inherently dangerous substances?

In which case did the Supreme Court uphold the constitutional validity of the National Awards like Bharat Ratna and Padma Vibhushan, stating that they do not violate the principles of Article 18?

Which case clarified the legal principle of “necessaries” in contracts involving minors?

In the Hari Shanker Jain case, the Supreme Court examined the eligibility criteria for:

The case of Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562 is often cited as the foundation for which legal concept in tort law?

In the case of State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas (1976) 2 SCC 310, the Supreme Court discussed the constitutional validity of:

The case of Sakal Papers v. Union of India AIR 1962 SC 305 dealt with restrictions on:

In the case of Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Smt. Deorajin Debi AIR 1960 SC 941, the Supreme Court discussed the principle of res judicata in relation to:

Hari Shanker Jain v. Sonia Gandhi case involves legal issues related to:

In which case did the Supreme Court emphasize that the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) includes the right to criticize the government?

The case of Rookes v. Barnard [1964] AC 1129 dealt with the legal concept of:

In which case did the Supreme Court lay down the test for determining whether a matter is res judicata, emphasizing that the decision must be on merits?

The N. Masthan Sahib case clarified the constitutional position of the Chief Commissioner of:

Which case discussed the constitutionality of the awards like Padma Vibhushan and Bharat Ratna, affirming that they do not violate the principles of Article 18?

In the case of Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341, the court established the rule for assessing:

Re Berubari Union case arose from a dispute between India and which neighboring country?

Which case clarified the legal principle of “consideration” in contracts and emphasized that it must move from the promisee?

In which case did the Supreme Court establish that “the right to move freely throughout the territory of India is not absolute and can be restricted for public order”?

Which case established that “reasonable restrictions on the right to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business must have a direct nexus to the nature of the profession”?

In R.C. Poudyal case, the Supreme Court considered the balance between:

The Supreme Court’s decision in Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel had a lasting impact on the interpretation of:

Golak Nath v. State of Punjab is often cited in discussions related to:

The Supreme Court’s decision in Babulal Parate case contributed to the development of:

Which case clarified that “reasonable restrictions on the right to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India can only be imposed for public interest”?

The case of Keshavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225 emphasized the importance of:

R.C. Poudyal case addressed issues related to the conservation of:

Which case established that “the right to legal aid is an integral part of the right to a fair trial”?

In Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 124, the Supreme Court held that restrictions on freedom of speech must be:

Maneka Gandhi v UOI established the principle that restrictions on personal liberty must be:

In which case did the Supreme Court clarify the principles of res judicata and held that a judgment in rem can operate as res judicata even in subsequent proceedings between different parties?

Babulal Parate v. State of Bombay involved a challenge to a law addressing issues of:

In which case did the House of Lords affirm the concept of “privity of contract” and restrict third-party rights in contracts?