In the case of Williams v. Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd. [1991] 1 QB 1, the Court of Appeal addressed the doctrine of:

Which case clarified the rule of invitation to treat and the display of goods in a shop as an invitation to customers to make an offer?

Which case involved the ICJ’s judgment that the use of nuclear weapons is generally illegal but can be lawful in self-defense in extreme circumstances?

In which case did the Supreme Court assert that “reservation in promotions requires backwardness and inadequacy representation to be established”?

Which fundamental right was primarily invoked in Babulal Parate v. State of Bombay?

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that “the right to equal pay for equal work is a constitutional right”?

Which case affirmed the principle that a person cannot be convicted solely based on a confession made to a police officer?

The case of Scruttons Ltd. v. Midland Silicones Ltd. [1962] AC 446 clarified the doctrine of:

Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel case is related to:

Which article of the Indian Constitution was invoked in Maneka Gandhi case to challenge the impugned action?

In which case did the Supreme Court of India introduce the concept of “aiding and abetting” in criminal liability?

Golak Nath v. State of Punjab is significant for its impact on:

In the case of R v. Collins [1973] 3 WLR 399, the House of Lords clarified the law on:

The case of Chappell & Co. Ltd. v. Nestle Co. Ltd. [1960] AC 87 is significant for its contribution to the law on:

Which case affirmed that “reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech must have a proximate and direct nexus to public order”?

In the case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd. [1915] AC 847, the House of Lords dealt with the concept of:

Which case is also known as the third judge case?

In which case did the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rule that a state’s right to self-defense against an armed attack is an inherent right under international law?

N. Masthan Sahib case involves a dispute related to the jurisdiction of:

Which case laid down the principle that “intention to cause bodily harm” is sufficient to constitute an assault?

Which case established that “reasonable restrictions on the right to assemble can only be imposed in the interest of public order”?

Which case established the rule that acceptance must be communicated to the offeror for a contract to be formed?

The case of Raffles v. Wichelhaus (1864) 2 Hurl. & C. 906 is known for addressing issues related to:

Which case held that “arbitrary and unguided power to fix license fees is violative of Article 14”?

In which case did the Supreme Court hold that “reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech can be imposed in the interest of public order”?

In Re Berubari Union case, the term “enclaves” refers to:

In Excel Wear v. Union of India, AIR 1979 SC 25, Supreme Court addressed which issue?

Which case established the “thin-skull” rule, stating that a defendant is liable for the full extent of the harm caused, even if the victim had an unusually fragile or sensitive physical condition?

In the case of R v. Herring (1992) 1 AC 580, the House of Lords clarified the law on:

In which year did the Supreme Court deliver the judgment in Chairman, Rly Board v Chandrima Das?

Which case established the concept of promissory estoppel, preventing a party from going back on its promise even in the absence of consideration?

Keshavananda Bharti case established the doctrine of:

The Supreme Court’s decision in Re Berubari Union primarily dealt with issues related to:

In the case of R v. Thabo Meli (1954) 1 WLR 228, the House of Lords addressed issues related to:

Which case held that the provision allowing preventive detention without disclosing grounds violates Article 14 and is void?

The dispute in Re Berubari Union case primarily concerns:

Which case emphasized that “the arbitrariness in governmental actions violates Article 14”?

The concept of basic structure was propounded in the context of amending which part of the Constitution?

In which case did the House of Lords establish the principle that a contract requires an offer and an acceptance, and both must be communicated?

The case of State of Maharashtra v. Budhan [1959] SCR 394 is significant for:

In which case did the Supreme Court rule that “arbitrary and discriminatory actions by the state violate the right to equality”?

In which case was it held that “the right to assemble peacefully without arms is a guaranteed fundamental right”?

In which case did the Supreme Court establish the doctrine of ‘reasonable classification’ under Article 14, stating that there must be intelligible differentia and a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved?

In the case of Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) 1 SCR 861, the Supreme Court dealt with the constitutionality of:

In which case did the Supreme Court assert that “the freedom of association includes the right to form associations or unions”?

Which case held that “the classification for taxation must have a reasonable nexus with the object sought to be achieved”?

The Supreme Court in Golak Nath case held that:

Which case established the rule that contractual obligations can be discharged by performance, agreement, frustration, or breach?

The Supreme Court’s decision in Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel case had implications for the reservation of seats in

Which case established the “eggshell skull” rule, stating that a defendant is liable for the full extent of the harm caused, even if the victim had a pre-existing medical condition?