Which case established that the absence of medical evidence does not necessarily weaken the prosecution’s case in a POCSO trial if there are other forms of evidence?

In the case of State of Tamil Nadu v. R. Balu, the Supreme Court discussed the concept of “aggravated penetrative sexual assault” under the POCSO Act. What specific circumstances constitute aggravated penetrative sexual assault?

Which case established that a child’s silence or hesitation in disclosing sexual abuse should not be treated as a sign of false implication?

Which case addressed the issue of child trafficking and its connection to POCSO cases?

In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar N. Mardikar, the Supreme Court ruled that failure to strictly comply with Section 32 of the POCSO Act would result in:

In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a child’s silence or hesitation in disclosing sexual abuse should not be treated as a sign of false implication?

In which chapter of the POCSO Act is the procedure for recording the statement of a child mentioned?

In the case of State of Karnataka v. Mohan, the Supreme Court held that a delay in reporting a POCSO offense by the victim can be explained based on:

In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Rahul, the Supreme Court discussed the age of the victim and its significance in determining the offense under the POCSO Act. What was the outcome of this case?

Under the POCSO Act, what is the punishment for using a child for pornographic purposes?

What does the term “aggravated penetrative sexual assault” refer to under the POCSO Act?

What is the punishment for making a false complaint under the POCSO Act?

What is the minimum imprisonment term for a person using a child for pornographic purposes under Section 7 of the POCSO Act?

Who can file a complaint under the POCSO Act on behalf of a child victim?

In the case of Mohd. Naushad v. State of Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court discussed the issue of consent and the age of the victim in a POCSO case. What was the outcome of this case?

The case of Anokhilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh is significant because it clarified that medical evidence is not necessary in every POCSO case if there is:

Which case clarified that a child’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC can be used as substantive evidence in POCSO cases?

In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar N. Mardikar, the Supreme Court clarified that a delay in reporting a POCSO offense by the victim can be explained based on:

What is the punishment for a person who fails to report information about the commission of an offense under the POCSO Act?

Can a child be repeatedly called to testify under the POCSO Act?

In the case of Subhash v. State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court held that the absence of medical evidence does not necessarily weaken the prosecution’s case in a POCSO trial if:

In the case of Komal v. State of Chhattisgarh, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of psychological counseling for child victims of sexual abuse under the POCSO Act. What did the Court recommend in this case?

The term “child-friendly” as mentioned in the POCSO Act refers to:

In the landmark case of Sakshi v. Union of India, which aspect of child protection did the Supreme Court emphasize?

Which case highlighted the importance of a child-friendly legal process and the need for support mechanisms for child victims in POCSO cases?

How many years of practice as an advocate are required for eligibility to be appointed as a Special Public Prosecutor under the POCSO Act?

According to the POCSO Act, who is considered a “child”?

The case of Ranjan Dwivedi v. State of Uttar Pradesh highlighted the need for specialized training of law enforcement officials in handling POCSO cases. What was the key aspect discussed in this case?

What does Section 3 of the POCSO Act deal with?

The case of State of Kerala v. Rasheed addressed the issue of false complaints under the POCSO Act. What did the Supreme Court state regarding false complaints?

Under Section 2(1) of POCSO Act “Special Court” means a court designated as such under which section?

In the case of Ram Adhar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court clarified that the “touching” mentioned in the POCSO Act should be:

In the case of Ram Adhar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court clarified that the term “touching” mentioned in the POCSO Act should be:

The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh case emphasized that the victim’s testimony in POCSO cases should be given great weight, even if there are minor contradictions. Which legal principle does this case highlight?

The case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramesh is notable for its discussion on the reliability of a child’s testimony in POCSO cases. What did the Supreme Court clarify in this case?

What is the punishment for an offender who commits a non-penetrative sexual assault on a child under the POCSO Act?

In which case did the Supreme Court of India clarify that under POCSO, a child’s testimony can be relied upon without corroboration if found credible?

In which chapter of the POCSO Act is the procedure for reporting cases dealt with?

What is the maximum punishment for an offender convicted under the POCSO Act for penetrative sexual assault on a child?

In the case of Anokhilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court ruled that medical evidence is not necessary in every POCSO case if there is:

What is the punishment for using a child for the production of sexually explicit material under the POCSO Act?

In the case of Kameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court discussed the significance of medical evidence in POCSO cases. What was the key takeaway from this case?

According to the POCSO Act, what age group does it primarily aim to protect?

In which case did the Supreme Court emphasize that the victim’s testimony in POCSO cases should be given great weight, even if there are minor contradictions?

Under what circumstances can the Special Court under the POCSO Act permit the disclosure of the identity of the child?

Who can be appointed as a special public prosecutor for POCSO cases, as per the Act?

In the case of Mohd. Naushad v. State of Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court held that failure to strictly comply with Section 32 of the POCSO Act would result in:

Which case emphasized that the victim’s age and understanding must be considered when assessing whether the offense committed under the POCSO Act is applicable?

To whom should information be provided under Section 20 of the POCSO Act?

Is absence of a culpable mental state a defense for the accused under the POCSO Act?